monkeyhanger wrote: ↑Sat Sep 11, 2021 4:47 pm
I've already made it clear what I consider the nearest ICE equivalent is to an ID3 Pro-performance - the Golf GTD, in both performance and equipment levels. The achievable price differential between the 2 is coppers after all incentives are accounted for. The Golf Life is significantly less well equipped than the ID3 Life and has access to much less powerful engines.
You're chosing to ignore the justified comparison I made even though it demonstrates marginal price differences between them. I included the purchase of 18" Derrys on the ID3 in the price compared with Golf GTD that already has them. On that basis I think it's pretty much the fairest comparison out there to demonstrate a lack of cost gap between ICE and EV for equivalent cars.
There's also the potential to save significantly on the fuel bill. If you have the facilities to do so and choose not to buy a home charger that could save £900 a year on your wife's mileage vs a 40mpg average petrol/diesel then you're really cutting your nose off to spite your face. It would go a long way to subsidise the cost of an EV.
On the basis of the above, I don't consider the ID3 in Life/Family guise to be more expensive than the ICE equivalent (Golf GTD).
If you want to compare a 204ps IDE Life to a 1.0 115ps Golf Life because they share the Word "Life" in their description, you know that's not right.
Getting people to trade in their 10 year old car that they bought at 6 years old for a third of new RRP is always going to be a big ask. Getting someone to pay £28k instead of £10k for their next car isn't going to happen for most, unless you start giving out £15k grants - that's just not going to happen. The people buying older cars will just have to wait for a 6 year old ID3 or e-Niro. As ageing stock filters through, there will be EVs for all budgets in future.
You can't give grants to people buying old EVs if there are no old EVs to buy right now (save for MK1 Leafs with woeful range). Why should a single car get grants applied St multiple stages of its life? Applying when new is the best timing for giving a grant, when it would be at its most expensive.
It does sound like you're begrudging the purchase of this Family for the wife and its way beyond what you'd normally pay for a car. If that's the case then you are comparing apples with oranges and calling oranges significantly more expensive.
Yes the £0 VED won't last (new EVs will be liable to VED from 2025, existing ones won't pay it). Not sure what your point is there though. £20 VED for cars like the one you currently own ceased in 2017 for new ones. The Government incentivised people into diesels (due to lower CO2) with low/no VED from around 2012 to 2017 (my 2013 Golf GTD attracted £20 VED, the wife's 2015 A1 1.6TDI had £0 VED), and now the government is tempting us into EVs with similar incentives. Grab them while you can.
Wow! I am not begrudged at all. I told her she had to get alloys (steel wheels are horrible) and metallic paint. I think with key-less entry she will lose her keys and the roof may crack by stones, knowing her luck.
There is no need to get personal. You have made false assumptions. My BMW cost far more than the ID3 Family all those years ago and has £7k extras. This is why I keep my cars for 10 years. I spent more than ID3 prices for a car for myself. Luckily, in 8 years all I have changed are brake pads and tyres (I had a basic 5 year service pack). I am looking at the i4. What is the equivalent ICE? Look at the price differences. No grant and no pay-back. I accept that. For me, electric will always be more expensive.
One cannot really compare engines. The range of EV is nowhere near a full tank, so should you consider the 77kw battery or wait to compare a 150kw battery! Why not?
As for mpg, her old Golf DSG Match 1.6 TDi would do over c.64mpg on long journeys and 50mpg in the city, not 40 mpg.
My diesel does 68mpg or 50+ mpg in the city. On a summer's day I have achieved over 70mpg on a 35 mile school run return trip.
I do not agree average mileage is 12k. I believe it is less than 8k. For 8k this is less than £1k fuel a year based on just 50mg diesel at todays high prices. Based on this, if a car costs £4k more, it is over 5 years for fuel payback, ignoring the home charger cost.
This link claims 7,400 miles, pre-covid in 2019 for private cars.
https://www.themoneyedit.com/insurance/ ... -in-the-uk
EV costs on average 14% more (or £116) to insure than ICE.
https://www.motortrader.com/motor-trade ... 21-06-2019
I would compare Life -v- Life and not a GTD. I think this is what VW thought when creating a replacement, else they would use different labels. You cannot directly compare specs of an ICE and EV. If you want to do this you need to get a battery size which provides an equivalent range as an ICE tank (150kw). if you consider "powerful engine" then consider range. Electric accelerate quicker. It is different technology. You need to wait for a 150kw battery. It is clearly a pointless comparison. As I said I find the price differential with Golf and ID3 is low (and the £1750 PCP scam makes it so low. But, this is not the same with other manufacturers.
Consider e-Niro (compare with Niro), Zoe (compare with Clio), Leaf and Kona with ICE equivalents. What are the price differences? Please state them. They are not insignificant. As I said, VW may be the lowest.
I would give grants to take old cars off the road to buy newer petrol cars and not provide grants for EV at all.
It is better to have all less polluting petrol/diesel cars than the middle class have EV and the poor stuck with old cars and hit with congestion charge diesel charge and higher excise duty. If you can afford £28k on a car, you can afford an extra £2.5k and do not need a grant. But £2.5k to a low income family is a lot and they could buy a less polluting car and have their old car scrapped. (What, but I am a Tory!) I would have purchased the ID3 even if there was no grant. I await compensation from diesel gate!
I do not believe EV cars are as green as claimed. Lithium mining is not green and mined with dirty diesel. Electricity used to power EV is not often generated green and is merely a transfer of emissions. The production is not green and old cars are scrapped with plenty of life in them meaning unnecessary energy use and emissions in making new EV cars to scrap cars with plenty of life in them.
But, my next car will an EV and I do not expect any payback. It will not be purchased to save money.
My wife will have her ID.3. It seems a good car. I viewed it as a Golf replacement.
But, I am certain I will not have an ID3 as my next car!