Brexit has absolutely nothing to do with it
That is a knee jerk political reaction
This is entirely the fault of IR35 and everyone in contracting knew it was going to happen
The government has to abolish IR35 now
Brexit has absolutely nothing to do with it
Brexit may not be the only factor but of course it is a contributory factor. If not, then better tell the government there's no need to issue those temporary visas to foreign lorry drivers.colonelpurple wrote: ↑Mon Sep 27, 2021 5:28 amBrexit has absolutely nothing to do with it
That is a knee jerk political reaction
This is entirely the fault of IR35 and everyone in contracting knew it was going to happen
The government has to abolish IR35 now
Sorry, I don’t see it as any kind of contributory factor at all, except for helping to cause the problemjhg wrote: ↑Mon Sep 27, 2021 9:34 amBrexit may not be the only factor but of course it is a contributory factor. If not, then better tell the government there's no need to issue those temporary visas to foreign lorry drivers.colonelpurple wrote: ↑Mon Sep 27, 2021 5:28 amBrexit has absolutely nothing to do with it
That is a knee jerk political reaction
This is entirely the fault of IR35 and everyone in contracting knew it was going to happen
The government has to abolish IR35 now
I don't want to get into a discussion on Brexit - that ship has sailed, for better or worse. I'm just pointing out your statement that Brexit is not a contributory factor to the current sitiuation is incorrect. The Road Haulage Association has claimed that the UK has lost 20,000 HGV drivers, who have returned to the EU as a result of Brexit. Yes, of course we could issue visas to drivers from anywhere in the world. However, EU drivers did not previously need to apply for visas to come here.colonelpurple wrote: ↑Mon Sep 27, 2021 11:25 amSorry, I don’t see it as any kind of contributory factor at all, except for helping to cause the problemjhg wrote: ↑Mon Sep 27, 2021 9:34 amBrexit may not be the only factor but of course it is a contributory factor. If not, then better tell the government there's no need to issue those temporary visas to foreign lorry drivers.colonelpurple wrote: ↑Mon Sep 27, 2021 5:28 am
Brexit has absolutely nothing to do with it
That is a knee jerk political reaction
This is entirely the fault of IR35 and everyone in contracting knew it was going to happen
The government has to abolish IR35 now
IR35 arose from EU inspired/directed legislation
We can just get rid of it now
We could issue visas to drivers from anywhere in the world, doesn’t have to be the EU
The loss of lorry drivers has been happening for quite a few years now. It’s not been an attractive job and as older drivers retired hauliers didn’t try to improve pay and working conditions to attract UK drivers. Easy option to employ EU drivers at lower wages. Brexit became a reality over 5 years ago and nothing was done to address the shortfall until now. Not just hauliers but business in general.jhg wrote: ↑Mon Sep 27, 2021 11:48 amI don't want to get into a discussion on Brexit - that ship has sailed, for better or worse. I'm just pointing out your statement that Brexit is not a contributory factor to the current sitiuation is incorrect. The Road Haulage Association has claimed that the UK has lost 20,000 HGV drivers, who have returned to the EU as a result of Brexit. Yes, of course we could issue visas to drivers from anywhere in the world. However, EU drivers did not previously need to apply for visas to come here.colonelpurple wrote: ↑Mon Sep 27, 2021 11:25 amSorry, I don’t see it as any kind of contributory factor at all, except for helping to cause the problem
IR35 arose from EU inspired/directed legislation
We can just get rid of it now
We could issue visas to drivers from anywhere in the world, doesn’t have to be the EU
truesmuj wrote: ↑Mon Sep 27, 2021 12:37 pm
The loss of lorry drivers has been happening for quite a few years now. It’s not been an attractive job and as older drivers retired hauliers didn’t try to improve pay and working conditions to attract UK drivers. Easy option to employ EU drivers at lower wages. Brexit became a reality over 5 years ago and nothing was done to address the shortfall until now. Not just hauliers but business in general.
IR35 should stay unless every worker is to be utilised as self-employed, including the check-out chicks at Tesco.colonelpurple wrote: ↑Mon Sep 27, 2021 5:28 amBrexit has absolutely nothing to do with it
That is a knee jerk political reaction
This is entirely the fault of IR35 and everyone in contracting knew it was going to happen
The government has to abolish IR35 now
That's untrue. There are supply issues across the EU and indeed the world. In the US they have started hoarding toilet rolls again https://www.marketwatch.com/story/costc ... 1632490566.Noel wrote: ↑Mon Sep 27, 2021 10:12 pm Of course Brexit is at the root of it. There are no shortages or supply problems in any of the main european countries. In this country there are shortages in nearly every sector, including building supplies and materials in most areas.. Have you been in a supermarket recently?
It's true that an ageing/retiring HGV population is not being replaced across the world but our reliance on foreign workers and their treatment (real and perceived) since brexit does appear to be an additional factor in these supply chain issues on this island.gailjon wrote: ↑Tue Sep 28, 2021 7:05 amThat's untrue. There are supply issues across the EU and indeed the world. In the US they have started hoarding toilet rolls again https://www.marketwatch.com/story/costc ... 1632490566.Noel wrote: ↑Mon Sep 27, 2021 10:12 pm Of course Brexit is at the root of it. There are no shortages or supply problems in any of the main european countries. In this country there are shortages in nearly every sector, including building supplies and materials in most areas.. Have you been in a supermarket recently?
In China they require an additional 4 million (!) hgv drivers.
A bloke named Beeching might know.
That’s quite a cruel view and also non-economicCherry wrote: ↑Mon Sep 27, 2021 7:02 pmIR35 should stay unless every worker is to be utilised as self-employed, including the check-out chicks at Tesco.colonelpurple wrote: ↑Mon Sep 27, 2021 5:28 amBrexit has absolutely nothing to do with it
That is a knee jerk political reaction
This is entirely the fault of IR35 and everyone in contracting knew it was going to happen
The government has to abolish IR35 now
One man companies "working" for the same company avoiding NI is a farce (especially in I.T). They are not "real" businesses.
They charge £50 an hour and pay themselves £10 an hour and the rest as dividends. But, no I.T. employee would work for £10 an hour. It is a scam.
The client interviews the contractor. The client would not accept the contractor substituting himself from day 1 for the entire contract,
The client wants the person interviewed to do the job.
Keep IR35. Do not allow any business expenses.
Impose a £10k charge for each work permit and 25% overseas employee charge per year to ensure the overseas worker is always more expensive than the UK worker.
Use his money to train UK workers. Never give a path to citizenship to work permit holders (like Middle East).
Introduce world wide taxation for UK citizens. If they do not want to pay they can relinquish UK citizenship and never get it back.
Cut unemployment benefit to force unemployed to do jobs they do not want to do e.g. fruit picking.
It is perfectly economic logic It is not cruel. 10-15% tax is selfish.colonelpurple wrote: ↑Thu Sep 30, 2021 7:32 am
That’s quite a cruel view and also non-economic
Contractors have no health, life or any other provision from work. When they take a sick day they don’t get paid. Every 3-6 months most have to look for a job again, and go through a full interviewing process for each application.
Further more, major industries rely on project based work. So they only want people during the life of a project. This could be in IT, insurance, banking, manufacturing, etc.
IMHO:
1. Contracting is an essential component for a developed economy to provide economic and effficient project based expertise
2. Due to the risk and the things I highlighted above, contractors deserve to pay less tax. 10%-15% is reasonable
3. Under IR35, contractors now pay 10% MORE then permanent staff, still with no protection
The current situation is unfair and unworkable and will destroy project based contracting in this country and have a permanent effect on the economy and growth.
ABOLISH IR35 NOW!
Firstly, I dont think you understand how IR35 works. Non-permanent contracting staff under IR35 pay more then 10% more tax then permanent staff. Its nothing to do with tax rates. Its because they have to pay NIeers as well as NIees, which permanent staff dont. This is completely unjustified and wrong.Cherry wrote: ↑Fri Oct 01, 2021 12:08 amThe contractors do not deserve to be paid less tax (only I do!). Their tax bands should be the same as employees on their company charge out rate.colonelpurple wrote: ↑Thu Sep 30, 2021 7:32 am
That’s quite a cruel view and also non-economic
Contractors have no health, life or any other provision from work. When they take a sick day they don’t get paid. Every 3-6 months most have to look for a job again, and go through a full interviewing process for each application.
Further more, major industries rely on project based work. So they only want people during the life of a project. This could be in IT, insurance, banking, manufacturing, etc.
IMHO:
1. Contracting is an essential component for a developed economy to provide economic and effficient project based expertise
2. Due to the risk and the things I highlighted above, contractors deserve to pay less tax. 10%-15% is reasonable
3. Under IR35, contractors now pay 10% MORE then permanent staff, still with no protection
The current situation is unfair and unworkable and will destroy project based contracting in this country and have a permanent effect on the economy and growth.
ABOLISH IR35 NOW!
They just deserve to be paid a higher rate.
They may pay 10% more tax as their rates are higher. The tax rates are set by the government. Let them be in the 40% tax band.
You think wrong. I made my money from the business. I know how it works and all the scams. Employees cannot pretend to be a company and reduce tax by paying family members or take dividends or claim travel and meals for going to work. Force contractors to be on a fixed term payroll at a slightly higher rate. Do not allow them to claim expenses or declare dividends.colonelpurple wrote:
Firstly, I dont think you understand how IR35 works. Non-permanent contracting staff under IR35 pay more then 10% more tax then permanent staff. Its nothing to do with tax rates. Its because they have to pay NIeers as well as NIees, which permanent staff dont. This is completely unjustified and wrong.
Secondly, temporary staff should be compensated with better tax conditions due to the reasons I listed above. Just like workers are on lower income, or domiciled aboard. You might not agree with this, as permanent employers dont really understand the idea of having to find a new job every six months. But as I said, an efficient developed economy needs project based staff. And to facilitate this insecure way of working, needs to provide an incentive. We can get rid of it with spite, but our economy will lag behind other developed economies.